Wednesday, January 5, 2011

INAUGURATION DAY

It’s official now. Last night (1/04/2011), we took our oath of office. I would like to first thank God for blessing me with this opportunity to serve the citizens of Morehouse Parish School Board (MPSB) District 6. I am a steadfast believer in MPSB’s motto “Obtaining Excellence in Education Through Quality Teaching”.  Accountability at every level in our public education system is the foundation upon which “excellence in education” can be achieved and all the stakeholders must know and understand their roles and responsibilities. These stakeholders include the Parents, the Community, the School Board, the Superintendent, and the Teachers.

At our meeting last night, we elected as Board President, Jeff Churchwell and yours truly, Board Vice President (both by a unanimous vote). The official journal of MPSB reported on its front page today (1/5/2011) a summary of the business that we handled at our inaugural meeting. However, I would like to caution those who have read or will read this article about its content because the narrative therein was not what actually transpired at the meeting.

For the record, I did not question the merits of using buses for field trips. I inquired about whether the Board had established guidelines that governed the approval of these trips. Why would I question this? Everything about these trips benefits the kids. And at the end of the day, that’s why we are in this “arena”.

Moreover, I did not direct any questions to the Testing Coordinator about the new testing security policy because I had just received the document moments before the meeting began. In fact, I explained my no vote prior to making the motion to approve it. I clearly stated that I believe in President Regan’s philosophy…“trust but verify” and that I didn’t want my “ no” vote to be construed as me not supporting testing security; rather, it should construed “I am not going to vote for something that I haven’t read”

You’re probably wondering, “why the different accounts of the meeting?” My answer is “just look who wrote the article”.  I’m not going to be used to sell newspapers, so there will be no written reply from me to the newspaper.  I’m just going to prepare a written statement to be included in the official minutes correcting the misrepresentations at our next meeting only because this newspaper is our official journal.

I will use this blog to communicate to the voters in my district as well as a quarterly newsletter that I plan to circulate. As President Theodore Roosevelt famously and in my opinion accurately said:

“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; because there is not effort without error and shortcomings; but who does actually strive to do the deed; who knows the great enthusiasm, the great devotion, who spends himself in a worthy cause, who at best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement and who at worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly. So that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.”

Monday, December 13, 2010

Letter to the Editor

Let me be the first to start a slow clap for Mr. Rainwater and let’s give him a standing ovation. In his column last week (Thursday, December 9, 2010, page 4 – Bastrop Daily Enterprise), Mr. Rainwater correctly pointed out that I was incorrect in suggesting that the Board should go into an executive session for organizational purposes during the first meeting of the new term. I didn’t do my homework with respect to knowing the limitations outlined in LSA-R.S. 42:17 and the Board’s attorney did his job by pointing that out. So, let’s make this a teachable moment by saying to everyone, “know the facts before you speak” and “before you write a column attacking a new school board member”.

Mr. Rainwater, you began your column by not having a real handle on the facts. Is this too an example of how some folks say (or write) things, thinking they’re going to impress people with what they know and only open their mouth far enough to get their foot firmly entrenched? Case in point: At the Morehouse Parish School Board meeting held on 12/7/2010, I (Member-elect Ricky Smith) did not request to have the meeting changed from Jan 4th to Jan 6th and if you, Mr. Rainwater, had bothered to read the agenda, you would have known this fact. But that fact probably didn’t fit into your narrative, because with out it, your story falls flat, which means you probably would have been forced to write about my electronic textbook resolution.

However, that would have shown the community that I’m concerned about the educational attainment of our children and I’m going to guess that’s not your motivation. I’m not sure what your agenda is and frankly my dear, I don’t give a “care”.

You are entitled to your own set of opinions, but not to your own set of facts. You can carry our current superintendent’s water and try to convince this community that the new Board is no different from those previous. GOOD LUCK WITH THAT!

But between you and I, I love this “_”. I knew all too well that you cannot take the politics out of public service and we all know politics can be a contact sport. I’m expecting some push back because I believe fundamental changes are needed, but I must warn you that I’m a different type of politician. I push back because I care more about doing what’s best for these kids than I am in getting re-elected. So, thanks for that first hit. The nerves are gone and now I’m ready to go fight for the kids in our district.

It will be interesting to read your articles in the coming months ahead. I hope you are more careful with the facts in the future. No pressure, sir: it’s just the future of your credibility resting in your hands. Don’t blow it.

Thursday, October 21, 2010

"RACE TO THE BOTTOM"

On October 7, 2010, the La Dept. of Education released the 2009-10 District Performance Scores (DPS) for each school district in the state and School Performance Scores (SPS) for each school in the state. Both scores are formulated by using scores from the LEAP, iLEAP, and GEE, as well as attendance, and graduation and dropout rates, but the DPS uses one year of data as if the district is one school.

Our DPS was 80.4; this was a 0.8 point decrease from the previous year (81.2). In 2007-08, our DPS was 82.3. Over the last three academic years, we have gone from a 82.3 to a 80.4. So now, Morehouse Parish is ranked 59th out of 69 school districts (not including the recovery school districts), which is in the bottom 15 percent. Based upon our DPS, we barely have a two star performance rating (a DPS range of 80.0 to 99.9).

*FYI: our district is only 20 points from being academically unacceptable and 60 point away from a five star rating (top performance label)*

As far as our individual schools are concerned, there are three schools that have an “academic watch” label (South Side, Cherry Ridge, & H.V. Adams); one school with a one star rating (Morehouse Jr. High/SPS 75.6); and four schools with two star ratings (Pine Grove, Oak Hill, Delta, & Bastrop High).

However, Beekman and Morehouse Magnet have a SPS greater than 100. Morehouse Magnet has a SPS of 129.2; and out of the more than 1,280 schools scored, Morehouse Magnet is ranked 30th in the state. Moreover, Morehouse Magnet is the only school in our district that has met Louisiana's 2014 target goal of all schools having a SPS greater than 120.

These stats are unacceptable to me. But, I guess the current Morehouse Parish School Board has no problem with our current trajectory. I say this because “who have they fired?” The superintendant still has his $124K-a-year job even though our district scores have declined every year…yes every year since his tenure began; AND by the way, this board extended his contract for 18 months by unanimous vote without including any specific performance objectives in the contract…ummmm…like requiring a yearly DPS growth rate between 5 and 7.5 so that the district could attempt to reach the 2014 goal.

None of our principals have been shown the door even though all, except for two, of them have been in their respective positions for at least the last five year. As far as I’m concerned, those 4 (four) principals are the only people in an academic-supervisory capacity that has any job security.  

DPS/SPS Ranges
5 Star – above 140.0
4 Star – 139.9 to 120.0
3 Star – 119.9 to 100.0
2 Star – 99.9 to 80.0
1 Star – 79.9 to 60.0
Below 60.0 – academically unacceptable